<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 485 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115067</link>
    <description>Design, drawings, technical specifications, testing and modification charges were not separately includible in the assessable value of the imported machine because the supplier&#039;s documents showed they were already part of the invoice price. Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 applies only when such charges have not been included in the price actually paid or payable. In the absence of evidence discrediting the supplier&#039;s correspondence or proving suppression or falsity, there was no basis for re-adding the charges to value. Confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:15:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 485 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115067</link>
      <description>Design, drawings, technical specifications, testing and modification charges were not separately includible in the assessable value of the imported machine because the supplier&#039;s documents showed they were already part of the invoice price. Rule 9(1)(b)(iv) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 applies only when such charges have not been included in the price actually paid or payable. In the absence of evidence discrediting the supplier&#039;s correspondence or proving suppression or falsity, there was no basis for re-adding the charges to value. Confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>