https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115062 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing deductions for sales tax, excess insurance collection, and banking charges. It held that the appellant's contentions were valid, emphasizing that sales tax deductions should cover the full amount paid, excess insurance collections should not be included in goods' value, and bank charges were deductible under the relevant Act. The Tribunal found errors in the differential duty demands made by the revenue, ultimately granting relief to the appellant and rejecting the revenue's appeals. en-us Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 May 2012 14:50:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115062 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing deductions for sales tax, excess insurance collection, and banking charges. It held that the appellant's contentions were valid, emphasizing that sales tax deductions should cover the full amount paid, excess insurance collections should not be included in goods' value, and bank charges were deductible under the relevant Act. The Tribunal found errors in the differential duty demands made by the revenue, ultimately granting relief to the appellant and rejecting the revenue's appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115062