<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 502 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115061</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai set aside a penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs imposed on a clerk in a Customs House Agent (CHA) firm for advising an NRI to claim an imported vehicle. The Tribunal deemed the penalty unjustified and inconsistent with penalties imposed on other clerks for similar actions. The decision emphasized the importance of fair and consistent penalty imposition, leading to the appeal being allowed and the clerk relieved of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 502 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115061</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai set aside a penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs imposed on a clerk in a Customs House Agent (CHA) firm for advising an NRI to claim an imported vehicle. The Tribunal deemed the penalty unjustified and inconsistent with penalties imposed on other clerks for similar actions. The decision emphasized the importance of fair and consistent penalty imposition, leading to the appeal being allowed and the clerk relieved of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>