<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 501 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by M/s. Delton Cables Ltd., upholding the decision that the bar of unjust enrichment was applicable. The appellant failed to substantiate that they bore the duty incidence and did not pass it on to their customers, leading to the rejection of the refund claim under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 501 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by M/s. Delton Cables Ltd., upholding the decision that the bar of unjust enrichment was applicable. The appellant failed to substantiate that they bore the duty incidence and did not pass it on to their customers, leading to the rejection of the refund claim under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>