<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 518 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the delay in exporting re-imported goods should be condoned due to an oversight by Customs Officers. The duty recovery demands were deemed unjustified as the goods were eventually exported, entitling the appellants to a drawback. The Tribunal directed a recalculation of the duty payable and drawback entitled, considering the extension granted. Additionally, interest under Section 47(2) was not upheld, and the matter was remitted back to Customs for reconsideration based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 518 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the delay in exporting re-imported goods should be condoned due to an oversight by Customs Officers. The duty recovery demands were deemed unjustified as the goods were eventually exported, entitling the appellants to a drawback. The Tribunal directed a recalculation of the duty payable and drawback entitled, considering the extension granted. Additionally, interest under Section 47(2) was not upheld, and the matter was remitted back to Customs for reconsideration based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>