<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 480 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115017</link>
    <description>Amounts paid during investigation toward alleged duty on suspected suppression of production are refundable where the underlying allegation of clandestine removal is not sustained in appeal and no duty demand survives. The payment cannot be retained as duty once it is found that no duty was ultimately payable. On that basis, refund was held admissible to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 480 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115017</link>
      <description>Amounts paid during investigation toward alleged duty on suspected suppression of production are refundable where the underlying allegation of clandestine removal is not sustained in appeal and no duty demand survives. The payment cannot be retained as duty once it is found that no duty was ultimately payable. On that basis, refund was held admissible to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>