<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 583 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114986</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s determination of Annual Capacity of Production (ACP) for a manufacturing unit despite exceeding actual production. The applicant&#039;s challenge led to a remand by CEGAT for redetermination of ACP. Settlement was allowed for SCNs postdating a relevant case, totaling Rs. 65,00,004/-. SCNs predating the case were ineligible for settlement due to lack of fresh disclosure. The judgment emphasized the need for redetermination based on actual production and upheld the Bench&#039;s jurisdiction over the case, ensuring oversight for resolution and enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:37:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 583 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114986</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s determination of Annual Capacity of Production (ACP) for a manufacturing unit despite exceeding actual production. The applicant&#039;s challenge led to a remand by CEGAT for redetermination of ACP. Settlement was allowed for SCNs postdating a relevant case, totaling Rs. 65,00,004/-. SCNs predating the case were ineligible for settlement due to lack of fresh disclosure. The judgment emphasized the need for redetermination based on actual production and upheld the Bench&#039;s jurisdiction over the case, ensuring oversight for resolution and enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>