https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114979 The Tribunal emphasized the importance of transparency in disclosing the basis and methods for determining normal value by the Designated Authority. It held that such information should not be confidential if it does not relate to specific manufacturers, following the precedent set in the Birla Ericsson Opticals case. The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to a pending Supreme Court decision, allowing for a fair resolution and ensuring compliance with legal principles regarding the disclosure of information used in calculating normal value and export price. en-us Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2012 17:13:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114979 The Tribunal emphasized the importance of transparency in disclosing the basis and methods for determining normal value by the Designated Authority. It held that such information should not be confidential if it does not relate to specific manufacturers, following the precedent set in the Birla Ericsson Opticals case. The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to a pending Supreme Court decision, allowing for a fair resolution and ensuring compliance with legal principles regarding the disclosure of information used in calculating normal value and export price. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114979