<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 502 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114978</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs cannot be denied merely because manufacturing loss exceeded a notional norm. Where the input fibre was admittedly used in manufacture and the excess loss was explained by poor material quality, the absence of evidence of over-consumption, suppression, clandestine removal, or other misuse meant the duty demand could not be sustained. CESTAT upheld the order setting aside the demand and penalty, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 502 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114978</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs cannot be denied merely because manufacturing loss exceeded a notional norm. Where the input fibre was admittedly used in manufacture and the excess loss was explained by poor material quality, the absence of evidence of over-consumption, suppression, clandestine removal, or other misuse meant the duty demand could not be sustained. CESTAT upheld the order setting aside the demand and penalty, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>