https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114955 Non-payment of the correct monthly duty after the furnace was treated as pusher type attracted penalty under Rule 96ZP(3)(ii), and subsequent payment of the differential duty with interest did not erase the default or the statutory consequence. The appellate authority was therefore not justified in deleting the penalty altogether, though the quantum could be adjusted on the facts. The order quashing the penalty was set aside and the penalty was restored. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2012 15:47:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114955 Non-payment of the correct monthly duty after the furnace was treated as pusher type attracted penalty under Rule 96ZP(3)(ii), and subsequent payment of the differential duty with interest did not erase the default or the statutory consequence. The appellate authority was therefore not justified in deleting the penalty altogether, though the quantum could be adjusted on the facts. The order quashing the penalty was set aside and the penalty was restored. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114955