<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 471 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty amount and penalty amount, ruling in favor of classifying the mis-rolls as waste and scrap under Section 7204.90. Despite the Commissioner&#039;s disagreement, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments, considering the need for remelting and inability to reuse the mis-rolls as semi-finished goods. The decision acknowledged the complexity of the classification issue and the recurring liability, leading to a full waiver of pre-deposit and a stay on the recovery of the amounts. Further hearings were scheduled to address the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 471 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty amount and penalty amount, ruling in favor of classifying the mis-rolls as waste and scrap under Section 7204.90. Despite the Commissioner&#039;s disagreement, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments, considering the need for remelting and inability to reuse the mis-rolls as semi-finished goods. The decision acknowledged the complexity of the classification issue and the recurring liability, leading to a full waiver of pre-deposit and a stay on the recovery of the amounts. Further hearings were scheduled to address the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>