<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 466 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114945</link>
    <description>Denial of requested examination and cross-examination of departmental and company witnesses, without recorded reasons, vitiated the show cause adjudication because the noticees were not given an effective opportunity to test adverse evidence. The tribunal held that reliance on such untested statements breached natural justice, and it did not examine the merits. The adjudication was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after allowing the requested cross-examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:21:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 466 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114945</link>
      <description>Denial of requested examination and cross-examination of departmental and company witnesses, without recorded reasons, vitiated the show cause adjudication because the noticees were not given an effective opportunity to test adverse evidence. The tribunal held that reliance on such untested statements breached natural justice, and it did not examine the merits. The adjudication was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after allowing the requested cross-examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>