<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 459 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114938</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay of demand and suspended the recovery process in a case where the appellant challenged a duty demand and penalties totaling approximately Rs. 91 lakhs imposed on the company and its officials. The appellant argued that they were entitled to clear up to 5% of goods as rejects, but only 2% was cleared in this instance. The goods in question were export rejects already disposed of. The Tribunal found that the appellant had a strong prima facie case and allowed the stay until the appeal was resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:35:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 459 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114938</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay of demand and suspended the recovery process in a case where the appellant challenged a duty demand and penalties totaling approximately Rs. 91 lakhs imposed on the company and its officials. The appellant argued that they were entitled to clear up to 5% of goods as rejects, but only 2% was cleared in this instance. The goods in question were export rejects already disposed of. The Tribunal found that the appellant had a strong prima facie case and allowed the stay until the appeal was resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>