https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114915 Credit on inputs could not be denied to the recipient merely because the supplier's full duty liability remained under dispute. The supplier had already paid duty on the undisputed portion, and the controversy before the High Court concerned only the final quantum of liability. Since Notification No. 58/97-C.E. was satisfied once duty payment on the inputs was established, the recipient's credit remained admissible. The pending dispute over the supplier's remaining liability did not defeat the recipient's entitlement to credit. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2012 12:32:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114915 Credit on inputs could not be denied to the recipient merely because the supplier's full duty liability remained under dispute. The supplier had already paid duty on the undisputed portion, and the controversy before the High Court concerned only the final quantum of liability. Since Notification No. 58/97-C.E. was satisfied once duty payment on the inputs was established, the recipient's credit remained admissible. The pending dispute over the supplier's remaining liability did not defeat the recipient's entitlement to credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114915