<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 503 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the imported goods were missing items, not replacements, and that charging duty again would constitute double taxation. The decision emphasized the need for fair and justified duty payments, considering the unique circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 503 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the imported goods were missing items, not replacements, and that charging duty again would constitute double taxation. The decision emphasized the need for fair and justified duty payments, considering the unique circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>