<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 502 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting exemption from Central Excise duty for cotton yarn supplied in Cross Reel Hanks under specific notifications. The Tribunal found that the appellant had met all conditions of the exemption notifications and refuted the Commissioner&#039;s reasons for denial. It was determined that no End Use Certificate was necessary, and the yarn&#039;s designated use in the Handloom Sector was valid. The Tribunal also held that any show cause notice preceding one year was time-barred under the Central Excise Act. Due to financial hardship and strong arguments presented, the Tribunal dispensed with the penalty and duty imposed by the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:33:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 502 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting exemption from Central Excise duty for cotton yarn supplied in Cross Reel Hanks under specific notifications. The Tribunal found that the appellant had met all conditions of the exemption notifications and refuted the Commissioner&#039;s reasons for denial. It was determined that no End Use Certificate was necessary, and the yarn&#039;s designated use in the Handloom Sector was valid. The Tribunal also held that any show cause notice preceding one year was time-barred under the Central Excise Act. Due to financial hardship and strong arguments presented, the Tribunal dispensed with the penalty and duty imposed by the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>