<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 476 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114843</link>
    <description>Imported glazed newsprint in reels was treated as classifiable under Heading 4801 after Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 48 brought all types of newsprint within that heading from 1-1-1996. On that basis, the claimed classification under Heading 4802.60 and the associated nil-rate exemption were not accepted. The specific customs notifications were applied instead, with the result that the goods were eligible only for the concessional duty treatment provided under those notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:51:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 476 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114843</link>
      <description>Imported glazed newsprint in reels was treated as classifiable under Heading 4801 after Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 48 brought all types of newsprint within that heading from 1-1-1996. On that basis, the claimed classification under Heading 4802.60 and the associated nil-rate exemption were not accepted. The specific customs notifications were applied instead, with the result that the goods were eligible only for the concessional duty treatment provided under those notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>