<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 468 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114835</link>
    <description>Declared import value may be rejected only if the Customs Valuation Rules are applied in their prescribed sequence, and any alternative benchmark must be based on reliable comparable imports. A single stray import with different country of origin, quantity and import circumstances could not justify enhancement, and the absence of contemporaneous, materially similar goods made Rules 5 and 6 inapplicable. Evidence of multiple clearances at comparable or lower prices, together with correspondence showing a negotiated price, also supported acceptance of the declared value. On these facts, the assessable value could not be enhanced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:33:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 468 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114835</link>
      <description>Declared import value may be rejected only if the Customs Valuation Rules are applied in their prescribed sequence, and any alternative benchmark must be based on reliable comparable imports. A single stray import with different country of origin, quantity and import circumstances could not justify enhancement, and the absence of contemporaneous, materially similar goods made Rules 5 and 6 inapplicable. Evidence of multiple clearances at comparable or lower prices, together with correspondence showing a negotiated price, also supported acceptance of the declared value. On these facts, the assessable value could not be enhanced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>