<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 454 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the denial of Modvat credit to the respondents on short found inputs. The Tribunal emphasized the incomplete entries in the statutory register and the burden of proof on the respondents to substantiate the shortage of inputs. It criticized the Commissioner (Appeals) for not addressing the core issue and remanded the matter for a fresh decision considering all relevant evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:22:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 454 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the denial of Modvat credit to the respondents on short found inputs. The Tribunal emphasized the incomplete entries in the statutory register and the burden of proof on the respondents to substantiate the shortage of inputs. It criticized the Commissioner (Appeals) for not addressing the core issue and remanded the matter for a fresh decision considering all relevant evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>