<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 453 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act on the appellants for illegal import of a vehicle. The penalties were reduced to Rs. 2 lakhs each, as the appellants were found actively involved in the import and sale of the vehicle. The Tribunal clarified that the CEGAT&#039;s remand was for re-determination of penalties, not for setting aside confiscation. The penalties were upheld based on clear findings of involvement in the illegal import, with one appellant implicated in fabricating documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:16:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 453 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act on the appellants for illegal import of a vehicle. The penalties were reduced to Rs. 2 lakhs each, as the appellants were found actively involved in the import and sale of the vehicle. The Tribunal clarified that the CEGAT&#039;s remand was for re-determination of penalties, not for setting aside confiscation. The penalties were upheld based on clear findings of involvement in the illegal import, with one appellant implicated in fabricating documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>