<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 452 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods for Exim Policy violation but set aside the enhancement of imported goods&#039; value. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting overvaluation and in line with previous Tribunal rulings. The redemption fine and penalty were reduced, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 452 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods for Exim Policy violation but set aside the enhancement of imported goods&#039; value. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting overvaluation and in line with previous Tribunal rulings. The redemption fine and penalty were reduced, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>