<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 431 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114813</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration of the modification application filed by the appellant regarding a stay order. The Tribunal disagreed with the appellate authority&#039;s reasoning that there was no provision for modifying the stay order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The stay petition was also disposed of in this process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 431 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114813</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration of the modification application filed by the appellant regarding a stay order. The Tribunal disagreed with the appellate authority&#039;s reasoning that there was no provision for modifying the stay order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The stay petition was also disposed of in this process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>