<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 596 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114795</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore due to non-service of notice on the respondents by the Revenue. Efforts to serve the notice were unsuccessful as the unit was not in existence and the intended recipient claimed to have been removed as a director. The dismissal was based on the requirement for proper notice as per a Supreme Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:14:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 596 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114795</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore due to non-service of notice on the respondents by the Revenue. Efforts to serve the notice were unsuccessful as the unit was not in existence and the intended recipient claimed to have been removed as a director. The dismissal was based on the requirement for proper notice as per a Supreme Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>