<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 595 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114794</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the claimed deductions under Octroi Heada for the year 1996-97 was found unsustainable due to higher actual expenses incurred by the assessee. However, duty on the differential amount for 1997-98 was deemed payable based on certified expenses. The imposition of penalty and interest was upheld, with no interest levied as duty was paid before determination. The penalty of Rs. 10,000.00 was deemed justified. The Tribunal concurred with the Commissioner&#039;s determination of duty on Octroi, upholding the decision without interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 595 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114794</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the claimed deductions under Octroi Heada for the year 1996-97 was found unsustainable due to higher actual expenses incurred by the assessee. However, duty on the differential amount for 1997-98 was deemed payable based on certified expenses. The imposition of penalty and interest was upheld, with no interest levied as duty was paid before determination. The penalty of Rs. 10,000.00 was deemed justified. The Tribunal concurred with the Commissioner&#039;s determination of duty on Octroi, upholding the decision without interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>