<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 642 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114789</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee, engaged in blending and selling tea, was not eligible for an investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as their activities did not amount to manufacturing or producing a new marketable commodity. The court distinguished the case from a Karnataka High Court decision, emphasizing the absence of certain sophisticated processes. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 642 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114789</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee, engaged in blending and selling tea, was not eligible for an investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as their activities did not amount to manufacturing or producing a new marketable commodity. The court distinguished the case from a Karnataka High Court decision, emphasizing the absence of certain sophisticated processes. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>