<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 493 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114788</link>
    <description>The court found Clause 4 of Notification No. 32/99 dated 8-7-1999 inconsistent with the industrial policy and struck down the conflicting clause. It held the government bound by Promissory Estoppel to provide tax exemptions as promised in the Office Memorandum. The notification was deemed non-compliant with the industrial policy, and petitioners were entitled to benefits under the new policy from the production commencement date. The court directed authorities to issue a fresh notification aligning with the original promise, granting exemptions from production commencement. Writ petitions were allowed, and the rule was made absolute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 493 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114788</link>
      <description>The court found Clause 4 of Notification No. 32/99 dated 8-7-1999 inconsistent with the industrial policy and struck down the conflicting clause. It held the government bound by Promissory Estoppel to provide tax exemptions as promised in the Office Memorandum. The notification was deemed non-compliant with the industrial policy, and petitioners were entitled to benefits under the new policy from the production commencement date. The court directed authorities to issue a fresh notification aligning with the original promise, granting exemptions from production commencement. Writ petitions were allowed, and the rule was made absolute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>