<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 447 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs&#039; orders confiscating pay orders under Section 121 of the Customs Act, emphasizing that the banks or depositors were the rightful claimants over the seized currency, not the appellants. The appellants&#039; claim of ownership over the currency was rejected as the pay orders were in the banks&#039; possession. Due to conflicting decisions on the confiscation of pay orders obtained through proceeds of smuggled goods, the Tribunal recommended a Larger Bench to determine the correct legal position, aiming to clarify the liability for confiscation and the appellants&#039; rightful claim over the amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:47:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 447 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs&#039; orders confiscating pay orders under Section 121 of the Customs Act, emphasizing that the banks or depositors were the rightful claimants over the seized currency, not the appellants. The appellants&#039; claim of ownership over the currency was rejected as the pay orders were in the banks&#039; possession. Due to conflicting decisions on the confiscation of pay orders obtained through proceeds of smuggled goods, the Tribunal recommended a Larger Bench to determine the correct legal position, aiming to clarify the liability for confiscation and the appellants&#039; rightful claim over the amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>