https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114779 The case involved the interpretation of Notification No. 35/95 regarding duty exemption on double yarn. The Tribunal highlighted the duty liability on double yarn before reaching the marketable stage and referred the matter to the Honorable President for the constitution of a Larger Bench to resolve conflicting interpretations conclusively. The decision emphasizes the need for a uniform approach in determining the dutiability of double yarn and ensuring clarity and consistency in excise duty regulations. en-us Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 May 2012 10:42:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114779 The case involved the interpretation of Notification No. 35/95 regarding duty exemption on double yarn. The Tribunal highlighted the duty liability on double yarn before reaching the marketable stage and referred the matter to the Honorable President for the constitution of a Larger Bench to resolve conflicting interpretations conclusively. The decision emphasizes the need for a uniform approach in determining the dutiability of double yarn and ensuring clarity and consistency in excise duty regulations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114779