<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 428 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114762</link>
    <description>A face wash marketed and presented as a skin-care product was treated as classifiable under Heading 3304 as a cleansing preparation for the care of skin, because the pack description, chemist&#039;s report and composition indicated cleansing, moisturising and skin-care characteristics. Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 33 brought the goods within cosmetics or toilet preparations, and Chapter Note 5 to Chapter 33 specifically covered cleansing creams under Heading 3304. The attempt to classify the product under Heading 3402 failed because the technical basis required under Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 34 was not established, and the HSN notes did not support treatment as a detergent or washing preparation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 428 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114762</link>
      <description>A face wash marketed and presented as a skin-care product was treated as classifiable under Heading 3304 as a cleansing preparation for the care of skin, because the pack description, chemist&#039;s report and composition indicated cleansing, moisturising and skin-care characteristics. Chapter Note 2 to Chapter 33 brought the goods within cosmetics or toilet preparations, and Chapter Note 5 to Chapter 33 specifically covered cleansing creams under Heading 3304. The attempt to classify the product under Heading 3402 failed because the technical basis required under Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 34 was not established, and the HSN notes did not support treatment as a detergent or washing preparation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>