<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 426 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114760</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112 of the Customs Act for possessing foreign origin goods without the required permit or license was reduced to Rs. 25,000. The confiscation of the goods was upheld due to lack of proof of lawful acquisition. The judgment emphasized the appellant&#039;s evident interest in the goods and the necessity for a reasonable penalty in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:17:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 426 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114760</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112 of the Customs Act for possessing foreign origin goods without the required permit or license was reduced to Rs. 25,000. The confiscation of the goods was upheld due to lack of proof of lawful acquisition. The judgment emphasized the appellant&#039;s evident interest in the goods and the necessity for a reasonable penalty in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>