<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of M/s. Prem Textile Limited, ruling that the Department is liable to pay interest for the delayed rebate, as per the provisions of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. The Explanation was interpreted as clarificatory rather than restrictive, allowing for the payment of interest beyond the 3-month refund period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of M/s. Prem Textile Limited, ruling that the Department is liable to pay interest for the delayed rebate, as per the provisions of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. The Explanation was interpreted as clarificatory rather than restrictive, allowing for the payment of interest beyond the 3-month refund period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>