<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 405 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114744</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the stay application, allowing the Revenue&#039;s request during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The order of the Commissioner was stayed based on the prima facie case made by the Revenue regarding the refund of duty paid on yarn used in the production of exempted goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 15:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 405 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114744</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the stay application, allowing the Revenue&#039;s request during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The order of the Commissioner was stayed based on the prima facie case made by the Revenue regarding the refund of duty paid on yarn used in the production of exempted goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>