<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 417 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114715</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed on the appellants under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act was invalid as the goods had already been exported and could not be confiscated under Section 113. The confiscation order was deemed legally flawed, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the appellants. The decision emphasized the necessity of ensuring legal validity in confiscation orders and penalties to avoid unjust outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 13:09:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 417 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114715</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed on the appellants under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act was invalid as the goods had already been exported and could not be confiscated under Section 113. The confiscation order was deemed legally flawed, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the appellants. The decision emphasized the necessity of ensuring legal validity in confiscation orders and penalties to avoid unjust outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>