<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 413 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114711</link>
    <description>The appeals dismissed for non-prosecution were restored, with the final order recalling the dismissal and reinstating the appeals. The Customs authorities had enhanced the declared value of Clock Mechanism imported by the appellant, citing import comparisons with another entity&#039;s branded goods. The distinction between branded and unbranded goods was crucial in determining the value. The judgment emphasized the necessity of adequate evidence in value determination, highlighting the lack of comprehensive information in the case records. Ultimately, the value enhancement decision was set aside, leading to the reversal of confiscation and penalty implications in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 11:59:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 413 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114711</link>
      <description>The appeals dismissed for non-prosecution were restored, with the final order recalling the dismissal and reinstating the appeals. The Customs authorities had enhanced the declared value of Clock Mechanism imported by the appellant, citing import comparisons with another entity&#039;s branded goods. The distinction between branded and unbranded goods was crucial in determining the value. The judgment emphasized the necessity of adequate evidence in value determination, highlighting the lack of comprehensive information in the case records. Ultimately, the value enhancement decision was set aside, leading to the reversal of confiscation and penalty implications in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>