<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 401 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114701</link>
    <description>Protection from coercive recovery was granted pending disposal of a rectification application, as the application had already been fixed for hearing and was due to be decided on the scheduled date. The operative effect was a temporary restraint on recovery action until the rectification proceedings were completed, preserving the status quo during the pendency of the request for correction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 11:10:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 401 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114701</link>
      <description>Protection from coercive recovery was granted pending disposal of a rectification application, as the application had already been fixed for hearing and was due to be decided on the scheduled date. The operative effect was a temporary restraint on recovery action until the rectification proceedings were completed, preserving the status quo during the pendency of the request for correction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>