https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114692 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai granted a stay on the impugned order allowing mutilation of imported goods due to lack of evidence of client requests, absence of government rules for mutilation, and concerns about mis-declaration of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence, legal framework, and procedural correctness in decisions regarding mutilation, highlighting the need for adherence to legal procedures and requirements in cases involving mis-declaration and revenue implications. en-us Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 May 2012 10:25:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114692 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai granted a stay on the impugned order allowing mutilation of imported goods due to lack of evidence of client requests, absence of government rules for mutilation, and concerns about mis-declaration of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence, legal framework, and procedural correctness in decisions regarding mutilation, highlighting the need for adherence to legal procedures and requirements in cases involving mis-declaration and revenue implications. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114692