<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 391 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114691</link>
    <description>Goods found unaccounted by registered dealers may be confiscated for breach of record-keeping obligations, and a redemption fine in lieu of confiscation remains permissible even where the goods were provisionally released on bond. The confiscation and reduced redemption fine were upheld because the goods were not duly accounted for in the statutory records. A penalty for violation of Rule 57GG was also sustained, with the lower amount recorded in the detailed discussion treated as the correct figure despite a typographical inconsistency elsewhere in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 391 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114691</link>
      <description>Goods found unaccounted by registered dealers may be confiscated for breach of record-keeping obligations, and a redemption fine in lieu of confiscation remains permissible even where the goods were provisionally released on bond. The confiscation and reduced redemption fine were upheld because the goods were not duly accounted for in the statutory records. A penalty for violation of Rule 57GG was also sustained, with the lower amount recorded in the detailed discussion treated as the correct figure despite a typographical inconsistency elsewhere in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>