<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 390 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114690</link>
    <description>Bulk medicinal preparations awaiting filling, packing and labelling were not yet finished and marketable goods, so their non-entry in RG-1 could not be treated as a shortage of finished stock. The applicable excise trade notices recognised RG-1 accounting only when goods reached the finished stage, and the Drugs &amp; Cosmetics Act required prescribed labelling before sale or distribution. On that basis, the alleged shortages were not proved as finished goods shortages; the reconciliation statement and voluntary payment on the admitted shortage further supported the assessee. The demand of duty, with consequential penalty and interest, was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 390 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114690</link>
      <description>Bulk medicinal preparations awaiting filling, packing and labelling were not yet finished and marketable goods, so their non-entry in RG-1 could not be treated as a shortage of finished stock. The applicable excise trade notices recognised RG-1 accounting only when goods reached the finished stage, and the Drugs &amp; Cosmetics Act required prescribed labelling before sale or distribution. On that basis, the alleged shortages were not proved as finished goods shortages; the reconciliation statement and voluntary payment on the admitted shortage further supported the assessee. The demand of duty, with consequential penalty and interest, was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>