<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 389 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand for shortage of finished goods but affirmed duty demand on goods removed with kacha challans. The duty demand on short found raw material was also set aside. The penalty amount was reduced to Rs. 10,000 after allowing the benefit of cum-duty price, resulting in a substantial reduction of duty liability. The impugned order was modified accordingly, disposing of the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:50:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 389 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty demand for shortage of finished goods but affirmed duty demand on goods removed with kacha challans. The duty demand on short found raw material was also set aside. The penalty amount was reduced to Rs. 10,000 after allowing the benefit of cum-duty price, resulting in a substantial reduction of duty liability. The impugned order was modified accordingly, disposing of the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>