https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114673 The Tribunal modified the stay order, removing the pre-deposit obligation for the applicant due to the department's attachment of property equivalent to the required amount. The Tribunal acknowledged that the purpose of safeguarding Government revenue was fulfilled through the property attachment, thus dispensing with the pre-deposit directive. This decision provided relief to the applicant by allowing the appeal to proceed without the need for the pre-deposit amount, ensuring Government revenue protection through the attached property. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 May 2012 18:06:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114673 The Tribunal modified the stay order, removing the pre-deposit obligation for the applicant due to the department's attachment of property equivalent to the required amount. The Tribunal acknowledged that the purpose of safeguarding Government revenue was fulfilled through the property attachment, thus dispensing with the pre-deposit directive. This decision provided relief to the applicant by allowing the appeal to proceed without the need for the pre-deposit amount, ensuring Government revenue protection through the attached property. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114673