https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114658 The Tribunal rejected the application for modification of the Stay Order, which sought the release of confiscated goods upon the execution of an additional bank guarantee. The Tribunal found the grounds for modification unconvincing, emphasizing that the applicant could redeem the goods by paying the fine ordered by the Commissioner if they were meant for export. It was noted that the Tribunal does not consider stay applications related to redemption fines under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Therefore, the original stay order was affirmed, and the modification application was denied. en-us Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 May 2012 17:18:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114658 The Tribunal rejected the application for modification of the Stay Order, which sought the release of confiscated goods upon the execution of an additional bank guarantee. The Tribunal found the grounds for modification unconvincing, emphasizing that the applicant could redeem the goods by paying the fine ordered by the Commissioner if they were meant for export. It was noted that the Tribunal does not consider stay applications related to redemption fines under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Therefore, the original stay order was affirmed, and the modification application was denied. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114658