https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114657 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellants, setting aside the Adjudication Order demanding duty on Horton Spheres and Petals. Relying on a previous ruling, the Tribunal determined that no distinct identifiable product subject to excise duty was manufactured during the installation and erection of the spheres. The decision favored the appellants based on the established legal precedent regarding the excisability of Horton Spheres. en-us Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 May 2012 17:15:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114657 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellants, setting aside the Adjudication Order demanding duty on Horton Spheres and Petals. Relying on a previous ruling, the Tribunal determined that no distinct identifiable product subject to excise duty was manufactured during the installation and erection of the spheres. The decision favored the appellants based on the established legal precedent regarding the excisability of Horton Spheres. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114657