<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 523 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114610</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs was available only subject to the conditions in Notification No. 8/93 dated 1-11-1993, including proper treatment of Special Excise Duty credit and maintenance of separate accounts. Where the assessee merged basic duty with Special Excise Duty and did not keep separate accounts, the credit claim failed to satisfy the prescribed conditions for availment and utilisation. Denial of Modvat credit was therefore upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:25:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 523 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114610</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs was available only subject to the conditions in Notification No. 8/93 dated 1-11-1993, including proper treatment of Special Excise Duty credit and maintenance of separate accounts. Where the assessee merged basic duty with Special Excise Duty and did not keep separate accounts, the credit claim failed to satisfy the prescribed conditions for availment and utilisation. Denial of Modvat credit was therefore upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>