<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 589 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114609</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed, with the appellants succeeding in challenging the findings related to unaccounted finished goods and raw materials shortage. The Commissioner&#039;s decision confirming demand on unaccounted finished goods was upheld based on the appellants&#039; admission, leading to rejection of the appeal on this issue. However, the appeal was partially allowed due to procedural irregularities in the verification process of raw materials, specifically slitted materials, which led to inaccuracies in stock verification. The appellants were granted consequential benefits as a result of the appeal decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:23:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 589 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114609</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed, with the appellants succeeding in challenging the findings related to unaccounted finished goods and raw materials shortage. The Commissioner&#039;s decision confirming demand on unaccounted finished goods was upheld based on the appellants&#039; admission, leading to rejection of the appeal on this issue. However, the appeal was partially allowed due to procedural irregularities in the verification process of raw materials, specifically slitted materials, which led to inaccuracies in stock verification. The appellants were granted consequential benefits as a result of the appeal decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>