<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 575 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of iron and steel products manufactured by M/s. Venkateshwar Ispat (P) Ltd. under sub-heading 7214.90 as other bars and rods of non-alloy steel. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, seeking a classification under sub-heading 7211.59 based on rectangular cross-section, was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the products had uneven thickness and width, not fitting the classification under sub-heading 7211.59, supported by a Certificate of Analysis. The decision was based on previous Tribunal orders and the physical characteristics of the products, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:07:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 575 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of iron and steel products manufactured by M/s. Venkateshwar Ispat (P) Ltd. under sub-heading 7214.90 as other bars and rods of non-alloy steel. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, seeking a classification under sub-heading 7211.59 based on rectangular cross-section, was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the products had uneven thickness and width, not fitting the classification under sub-heading 7211.59, supported by a Certificate of Analysis. The decision was based on previous Tribunal orders and the physical characteristics of the products, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>