<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 348 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114587</link>
    <description>Notification No. 1/93-C.E. granted exemption subject to specified conditions, including availability to registered small-scale units, while also extending a limited benefit up to a clearance value of Rs. 10 lakhs to unregistered units. That limited extension did not make the exemption unconditional or compulsory. A manufacturer was therefore not required to mandatorily avail the exemption in every case, but had to satisfy the prescribed conditions before claiming it. The Revenue&#039;s argument that compulsory exemption availing would bar Modvat credit under Rule 57C was rejected, and the objection to credit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 348 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114587</link>
      <description>Notification No. 1/93-C.E. granted exemption subject to specified conditions, including availability to registered small-scale units, while also extending a limited benefit up to a clearance value of Rs. 10 lakhs to unregistered units. That limited extension did not make the exemption unconditional or compulsory. A manufacturer was therefore not required to mandatorily avail the exemption in every case, but had to satisfy the prescribed conditions before claiming it. The Revenue&#039;s argument that compulsory exemption availing would bar Modvat credit under Rule 57C was rejected, and the objection to credit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>