<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 347 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114586</link>
    <description>Imported metal belts lacing were examined under the relevant Export-Import Policy and the applicable ITC (HS) classification. On that basis, the goods were found to be freely importable for the relevant period, and no special import licence was required even under sub-heading 73262000.10. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:56:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 347 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114586</link>
      <description>Imported metal belts lacing were examined under the relevant Export-Import Policy and the applicable ITC (HS) classification. On that basis, the goods were found to be freely importable for the relevant period, and no special import licence was required even under sub-heading 73262000.10. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>