<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 415 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Modvat credit on bright steel bars and LDPE granules. It held that both items were essential to the manufacturing process, making them eligible for input credit. The denial based on consumption during annealing and a delay in return of converted goods was deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 415 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of Modvat credit on bright steel bars and LDPE granules. It held that both items were essential to the manufacturing process, making them eligible for input credit. The denial based on consumption during annealing and a delay in return of converted goods was deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>