https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114543 The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Appellant, a manufacturer of steel products, was maintainable before the Commissioner (Appeals) as the order determining annual capacity production was passed by the Deputy Commissioner, not merely communicated. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merit after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the Appellants. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand. en-us Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 May 2012 15:27:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114543 The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Appellant, a manufacturer of steel products, was maintainable before the Commissioner (Appeals) as the order determining annual capacity production was passed by the Deputy Commissioner, not merely communicated. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merit after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the Appellants. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114543