<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 406 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114535</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving denial of Modvat credit and penalties. The denial of credit amounting to Rs. 1,70,000 was challenged, with the Tribunal agreeing that the inputs were used in production, not just in R&amp;amp;D. Similarly, the denial of credit of Rs. 8,511 for alleged R&amp;amp;D usage was overturned as the inputs were standardly tested in R&amp;amp;D before production use. The penalty for non-utilization of credit was set aside since the credit remained unutilized. The Tribunal directed the appellant to reverse the unutilized credit entry and emphasized the importance of actual input utilization for credit claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:54:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 406 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114535</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving denial of Modvat credit and penalties. The denial of credit amounting to Rs. 1,70,000 was challenged, with the Tribunal agreeing that the inputs were used in production, not just in R&amp;amp;D. Similarly, the denial of credit of Rs. 8,511 for alleged R&amp;amp;D usage was overturned as the inputs were standardly tested in R&amp;amp;D before production use. The penalty for non-utilization of credit was set aside since the credit remained unutilized. The Tribunal directed the appellant to reverse the unutilized credit entry and emphasized the importance of actual input utilization for credit claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>